I am currently researching anti-vaccinations in an attempt to form a well-rounded response on all the facts surrounding vaccination. For those who defend vaccinations they say “and there is abundant research” about this and that.
I’m sorry, but if I was going to take your word for it I wouldn’t be looking up the facts in the first place. If there is not scientifically backed research I am going to be unable to add it to my review of the anti-vaccination movement.
Although using this type of screening will make my research one sided, I will definitely go through a peer review phase where people will be welcome to object with the facts they insist exist.
As for those that state how they don’t want to go through the effort to find the research that I am expected to find. Too bad, if you won’t defend your own opinions, the facts you are putting out there, then you won’t be included. I’m not going to waste my time building your argument for you.